Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Alamosaurus sanjuanensis by Teratophoneus Alamosaurus sanjuanensis by Teratophoneus
Alamosaurus sanjuanensis is the biggest north American sauropod found so far. Newer fossils found indicate that this animal approached the size of Argentinosaurus and Puertasaurus ,both from south america, which means that alamosaurus was one of the biggest dinosaurs ever to walk the eart. Alamosaurus is one of the last titanosaurs and the last big sauropod of North america. Alamosaurus was a plant eater with a long neck and a long tail.
My alamosaurus is based on scott hartmans skeletal reconstruction of alamosaurus[link]
although I think my one turned out a bit too compact..
Add a Comment:
 
:iconacrocanthosaurusa:
AcrocanthosaurusA Featured By Owner Jan 19, 2016
I feel like 35-40 meters is a bit oversized.
Reply
:iconpaleosir:
paleosir Featured By Owner Oct 3, 2016  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
then your feelings are correct.
Reply
:iconrexfan684:
RexFan684 Featured By Owner Oct 29, 2013  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Awesome. Shows that North America is back in the running for having the biggest sauropod. I find it interesting that, at first, Alamosaurus was thought to have only been 50-60 ft long and 20 tons in weight, but now it's known that it was over 100 ft long and 80-100+ tons. Incredible and great comparison.
Reply
:iconmasonday:
masonday Featured By Owner Sep 20, 2012
COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
:iconvasix:
vasix Featured By Owner Sep 15, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Tyrannosaurus' biggest challenge ever
Reply
:iconiherduleikdragonites:
iherduleikdragonites Featured By Owner Sep 10, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
This thing has always been my favorite sauropod, except for maybe Saltasaurus (as I heard of it earlier than almost any other dinosaur), and I'm glad you illustrated it! Keep it up! (By the way, I knew Alamosaurus was huge, but this!? Wow!)
Reply
:iconpeteridish:
PeteriDish Featured By Owner Sep 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
what a behemoth! =D
Reply
:iconsaberrex:
Saberrex Featured By Owner Sep 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Wonderful. its about time we saw a model of Alamosaurus to scale. i really wonder how Tyrannosaurus rex could bring one down though.
Reply
:iconteratophoneus:
Teratophoneus Featured By Owner Sep 9, 2012
hmm, t rex maybe hunted in packs/families so I think they would select one of the young or old ones and then target the legs of the alamosaurus to bring it down...
Reply
:iconsaberrex:
Saberrex Featured By Owner Sep 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
perhaps. i always have believed females and young lived in groups while males were loners, which may be why we only have 5 male T. rexes on display
Reply
:iconhumondramon:
humondramon Featured By Owner Sep 10, 2012
Maybe T-rex not only hunted in packs, but (as theorized in "Jurassic Fight Club) T-rex may have had a bite filled with deadly bacteria, taking bites & chunks of the Alamosaur while slowly killing it with infection.
Reply
:iconspinoinwonderland:
SpinoInWonderland Featured By Owner Aug 8, 2014
JFC is nonsense. So many inaccuracies. The septic bite "theory" has no actual evidence to back it up, and was just pulled out of nowhere.

Alamosaurus is, to put it simply, just far beyond any theropod's league.
Reply
:iconsaberrex:
Saberrex Featured By Owner Sep 10, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
that i agree with too.
Reply
:iconemperordinobot:
EmperorDinobot Featured By Owner Sep 9, 2012
me fucksta so much, I love it. I'm due to make this animal at some time.
Reply
:iconjurassicmedia:
JurassicMedia Featured By Owner Sep 9, 2012
Wow. Wie groß konnte der werden? (Höhe)
Und war dieser größer als ein Brachiosaurus?
Reply
:iconteratophoneus:
Teratophoneus Featured By Owner Sep 9, 2012
also er ist definitiv größer als brachiosaurus. Ich glaub aber das ichs mit der höhe ein klein wenig übertrieben hab, der hals müsst etwas länger sein und der rest des körpers ein klein wenig kleiner...von der höhe müste der in etwa so hoch wie puertasaurus sein.
Reply
:iconjurassicmedia:
JurassicMedia Featured By Owner Sep 9, 2012
Danke für die Info! ;)
Reply
:icontitanlizard:
titanlizard Featured By Owner Sep 9, 2012
The alamosaurus evolved from the south-american sauropods? Or the asian sauropods?
Reply
:icontroythedinosaur:
TroytheDinosaur Featured By Owner Sep 9, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I think it had ancestors in North America.
Reply
:iconpaleo-king:
Paleo-King Featured By Owner Oct 6, 2012  Professional Traditional Artist
Nope. Probably South America. There were no titanosaurs in North America before Alamosaurus - only basal titanosauriforms, and most of those died out in the mid-cretaceous. South America, the heartland of titanosaurs, was isolated for a long time and only joined with North America in the campanian-maastrichtian epochs at the end of the cretaceous. Alamosaurus has close relatives in South America (like Tapuiasaurus) and apparently was the only titanosaur to migrate into North America. It was the original "border-jumper". :XD:
Reply
:iconprocrastinatingstill:
Actually the early Cretaceous Titanosaurs would be plausible ancestors for Alamosaurus.
Reply
:iconpaleo-king:
Paleo-King Featured By Owner Oct 21, 2014  Professional Traditional Artist
Doubtful. They are not true titanosaurs in North America. There were basal titanosauriforms like Sauroposeidon. Early-cretaceous North America doesn't have any true titanosaurs... at lease not that we know of. The majority of basal titanosauriforms there didn't get any more derived than Chubutisaurus. Not even euhelopodids, let alone titanosaurs. And they disappeared after the Cenomanian epoch.

Alamosaurus on the other hand is a very derived animal, a nemegtosaur or saltasaur. Clear South American lineage there.
Reply
:iconprocrastinatingstill:
Those basal Titanosauriforms would have been plausible ancestors. Also preservational bias could be at work.

Also inhabitants of an upland environment like Alamosaurus are more likely to be endemic than coastal species, and tend to have less of an ability to cross bodies of water.[
Reply
:iconpaleo-king:
Paleo-King Featured By Owner Oct 22, 2014  Professional Traditional Artist
I doubt it. Alamosaurus clusters as a saltasaur or nemegtosaur in practically every study ever done. It clusters very closely with Rapetosaurus, Neuquensaurus, Adamantisaurus, etc.,  if you are looking for possible ancestors, best to look there... not with basal titanosauriforms. North America's basal titanosauriformes didn't evolve into titanosaurs, they just died out at the end of the Cenomanian. The derived end of titanosauria, including nemegtosauridae, already existed in South America in the previous epoch, the Albian. The North American forms were primitive stragglers of a much more ancient (likely Jurassic-age) lineage, they definitely were NOT the ancestors of nemegtosauridae. Paluxysaurus, after all, had no time machine to travel back in time to before the Albian! If there is preservational bias, then at some point we should find Alamosaurus-like nemegtosaurs in Albian and Cenomanian deposits in North America, since Tapuiasaurus was already present by that time in South America. No such luck. In fact Tapuiasaurus shows that the nemegtosaur lineage evolved far earlier than once thought, and likely did so in South America, at a time when North America was cut off from it (and from every other continent - the land bridges of the Campanian/Maastrichtian still did not exist).

For something like Paluxysaurus to transform into Alamosaurus takes way too many taxonomic steps, including several REVERSALS of already-proven evolutionary steps at the far-basal end of titanosauriformes (i.e. where Chubutisauridae diverged from the main line of titanosauriform evolution that ultimately led to true titanosaurs.) If the North American forms had survived past the Cenomanian and evolved into something new, it would not have been a titanosaur. Just another basal somphospondylian, more advanced than the common titanosauriform ancestor, but in a VERY different way than the titanosaurs. To argue otherwise would be to ignore all the evidence, and to invent a new dinosaurian form of discredited "polygenic" racial theories like Haeckelism.

A proven titanosaur cannot "re-evolve" from a group that long before split off from the ancestors of titanosauria. Once you split off from another lineage, you're not going to give rise to its descendants. To put it another way, you can't be the father of your 10th cousins whom you've never met... or their descendants. :XD:
Reply
:iconprocrastinatingstill:
ProcrastinatingStill Featured By Owner Nov 2, 2014
South America wasn't connected to North America at the time. I doubt Alamosaurus could have swam that distance.
Reply
(1 Reply)
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
September 9, 2012
Image Size
476 KB
Resolution
1754×1232
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
9,198 (2 today)
Favourites
117 (who?)
Comments
26
Downloads
947
×